Methodology

The research behind the numbers.

Every default in the ROI calculators is sourced from published research. Every input is editable, so buyers can tune the model to their own organization. This page documents each input, its default, its range, the formula that uses it, and the source.

← Back to calculator

Customer ROI Calculator

Workforce-impact inputs used on /get-started/organization/impact.

Employee Memberships

Default
500
Range
25 – 5,000 (step 25)
Source
No research default — set to reflect your deployment
Finding
Headcount enrolled in the Equinox Corporate program. Drives every dollar figure proportionally.

Avg Annual Healthcare Cost per Employee

Default
$10,000
Range
$5,000 – $20,000 (step $500)
Source
Kaiser Family Foundation Employer Health Benefits Survey
Finding
Employer-sponsored single-coverage premiums averaged ~$8,400 and family coverage ~$25,500 in recent surveys; $10,000 is a reasonable blended per-employee default.

Healthcare Cost Reduction

Default
20%
Range
5% – 30% (step 1%)
Source
Baicker, Cutler, Song — Health Affairs 2010
Finding
Meta-analysis of 32 studies found ~$3.27 saved per $1 spent on wellness programs, averaging roughly 25% reduction in medical costs. 20% is a conservative anchor.

Baseline Voluntary Turnover Rate

Default
13%
Range
5% – 40% (step 1%)
Source
Bureau of Labor Statistics — JOLTS Annual Separation Rates
Finding
U.S. annual voluntary quit rate has averaged ~13% in the 2024–25 JOLTS reports. Industry-specific rates range from 8% (finance) to 25%+ (hospitality, retail).

Retention Improvement

Default
10%
Range
1% – 25% (step 1%)
Source
Gallup — State of the American Workplace
Finding
Organizations with engaged workforces and strong wellness programs report up to 50% lower turnover. A 10% reduction is a conservative mid-range anchor.

Avg Cost to Replace an Employee

Default
$65,000
Range
$10,000 – $150,000 (step $5,000)
Source
SHRM + Gallup benchmarks
Finding
SHRM estimates replacement cost at 50–200% of annual salary depending on role. Six to nine months of compensation is typical for professional roles; $65,000 reflects a ~9-month anchor against a $100K salary.

Productivity Gain

Default
10%
Range
1% – 20% (step 1%)
Source
Harvard Business School (Goetzel et al.) — Employee Wellbeing, Productivity, and Firm Performance
Finding
HBS working paper reports 10–11% productivity gain for employees whose health improved under structured wellness programs. Applied as a percent of compensation in dollar terms.

Average Employee Salary

Default
$100,000
Range
$40,000 – $250,000 (step $5,000)
Source
Organization-specific — set to match your actual compensation
Finding
Used only to translate productivity gain (%) into productivity dollars. Set to your blended average including fully-loaded compensation where possible.

Monthly Rate per Employee Partnership

Default
$275
Range
$150 – $600 (step $25)
Source
Set to your proposed monthly rate per employee partnership
Finding
Represents the monthly per-partnership charge for corporate Equinox access. Annual Investment is computed as Partnerships × Monthly Rate × 12.

Customer ROI Formulas

Healthcare Savings

Memberships × HealthCost × (HealthReduction / 100)

Annual medical spend reduction attributable to the program, across the full enrolled population.

Retention Savings

Memberships × (TurnoverRate / 100) × (RetentionImprovement / 100) × ReplacementCost

Number of replacements avoided × cost per replacement. Only the marginal improvement counts — existing baseline turnover is not counted as savings.

Productivity Gains

Memberships × AvgSalary × (ProductivityGain / 100)

Productivity lift monetized as a percent of compensation. Assumes linear mapping between reported productivity and dollar output.

Total Annual ROI

HealthcareSavings + RetentionSavings + ProductivityGains

Sum of the three return categories. Intentionally excludes brand, recruiting, and engagement benefits that resist clean quantification.

ROI Multiple

TotalAnnualROI ÷ AnnualInvestment

Shown inside the drill-down. Unchanged by the Impact at Scale / Per Employee toggle because it's a ratio.

Limitations & Caveats

ROI from wellness programs varies significantly by industry, company culture, enrollment rate, and program design. The defaults shown are industry averages and should be tuned to reflect your organization's specific context.

The model assumes linear relationships between inputs and outputs (e.g., doubling memberships doubles savings). Real-world returns often exhibit threshold effects and diminishing marginal returns above certain participation levels.

Productivity gains are monetized as a percent of compensation, which is a useful shorthand but imperfect — not all salary-dollars translate directly to output, and knowledge-work productivity is difficult to measure at the individual level.

Retention savings count only the marginal improvement over your baseline turnover rate. The model does not claim credit for turnover that would have remained at baseline without the program.

Sources

  • Baicker, K., Cutler, D., & Song, Z. “Workplace Wellness Programs Can Generate Savings.” Health Affairs 29(2), 2010. healthaffairs.org ↗
  • Harvard Business School — Goetzel et al., “Employee Wellbeing, Productivity, and Firm Performance.” hbs.edu ↗
  • Harvard Business Review — “How to Gauge the Effectiveness of Employee Wellness Programs.” hbr.org ↗
  • SHRM — “Employers See Wellness Link to Productivity, Performance.” shrm.org ↗
  • Mercer — “Taking the Pulse of Employee Wellness Programs.” mercer.com ↗
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics — JOLTS Annual Separation Rates. bls.gov ↗
  • Grand View Research — Corporate Wellness Market Report. grandviewresearch.com ↗
  • Health & Fitness Association — Corporate Wellness Profitability Report. healthandfitness.org ↗
  • Wellhub — Corporate Wellness Report 2025 (referenced in industry literature)